593 lines
15 KiB
Markdown
593 lines
15 KiB
Markdown
# Git Workflow and Branching Strategy
|
|
|
|
This document outlines the git workflow, branching strategy, commit conventions, and code review guidelines for the glyphdiff.com project.
|
|
|
|
## Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
1. [Branching Strategy](#branching-strategy)
|
|
2. [Branch Naming Conventions](#branch-naming-conventions)
|
|
3. [Commit Message Conventions](#commit-message-conventions)
|
|
4. [Code Splitting and Merge Request Guidelines](#code-splitting-and-merge-request-guidelines)
|
|
5. [Branch Protection Rules](#branch-protection-rules)
|
|
6. [Git Hooks Configuration](#git-hooks-configuration)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Branching Strategy
|
|
|
|
We use a Gitflow-inspired branching strategy adapted for our development workflow. This strategy provides a clear structure for feature development, bug fixes, and releases.
|
|
|
|
### Branch Types
|
|
|
|
#### 1. `main` Branch
|
|
- **Purpose**: Production-ready code only
|
|
- **Protection**: Highest level of protection
|
|
- **Rules**:
|
|
- Only merge `release/*` or `hotfix/*` branches into `main`
|
|
- No direct commits allowed
|
|
- Must pass all tests and code reviews
|
|
- Tags are created from this branch for releases (e.g., `v1.0.0`)
|
|
|
|
#### 2. `develop` Branch
|
|
- **Purpose**: Integration branch for features
|
|
- **Protection**: High level of protection
|
|
- **Rules**:
|
|
- Merge `feature/*` and `fix/*` branches into `develop`
|
|
- No direct commits allowed
|
|
- Must pass all tests before merging
|
|
- Serves as the base for `release/*` branches
|
|
|
|
#### 3. `feature/*` Branches
|
|
- **Purpose**: Develop new features
|
|
- **Naming**: `feature/feature-name` (e.g., `feature/font-catalog`, `feature/comparison-grid`)
|
|
- **Base**: Always branch from `develop`
|
|
- **Merge**: Merge back into `develop` via Merge Request (MR)
|
|
- **Rules**:
|
|
- One feature per branch
|
|
- Keep branches focused and small
|
|
- Delete after merging
|
|
|
|
#### 4. `fix/*` Branches
|
|
- **Purpose**: Fix bugs discovered during development
|
|
- **Naming**: `fix/issue-description` (e.g., `fix/font-loading-error`, `fix/responsive-layout`)
|
|
- **Base**: Branch from `develop`
|
|
- **Merge**: Merge back into `develop` via MR
|
|
- **Rules**:
|
|
- One fix per branch
|
|
- Include tests that verify the fix
|
|
- Delete after merging
|
|
|
|
#### 5. `hotfix/*` Branches
|
|
- **Purpose**: Critical fixes for production issues
|
|
- **Naming**: `hotfix/critical-fix` (e.g., `hotfix/security-patch`, `hotfix-production-crash`)
|
|
- **Base**: Branch from `main`
|
|
- **Merge**: Merge into both `main` and `develop`
|
|
- **Rules**:
|
|
- Use only for production emergencies
|
|
- Must be thoroughly tested
|
|
- Create a release tag after merging to `main`
|
|
|
|
#### 6. `release/*` Branches
|
|
- **Purpose**: Prepare for a new release
|
|
- **Naming**: `release/vX.Y.Z` (e.g., `release/v1.0.0`, `release/v1.1.0`)
|
|
- **Base**: Branch from `develop`
|
|
- **Merge**: Merge into both `main` and `develop`
|
|
- **Rules**:
|
|
- Finalize release notes
|
|
- Update version numbers
|
|
- Perform final testing
|
|
- Create release tag after merging to `main`
|
|
|
|
### Branch Workflow Diagram
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
main (production)
|
|
↑
|
|
│ hotfix/*, release/*
|
|
│
|
|
develop (integration)
|
|
↑
|
|
│ feature/*, fix/*
|
|
│
|
|
feature branches
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Branch Naming Conventions
|
|
|
|
### Feature Branches
|
|
- Format: `feature/feature-name`
|
|
- Examples:
|
|
- `feature/font-catalog`
|
|
- `feature/comparison-grid`
|
|
- `feature/dark-mode`
|
|
- `feature/google-fonts-integration`
|
|
|
|
### Fix Branches
|
|
- Format: `fix/issue-description`
|
|
- Examples:
|
|
- `fix/font-loading-error`
|
|
- `fix/responsive-layout`
|
|
- `fix/state-persistence`
|
|
- `fix-accessibility-contrast`
|
|
|
|
### Hotfix Branches
|
|
- Format: `hotfix/critical-fix`
|
|
- Examples:
|
|
- `hotfix/security-patch`
|
|
- `hotfix-production-crash`
|
|
- `hotfix-api-rate-limit`
|
|
|
|
### Release Branches
|
|
- Format: `release/vX.Y.Z`
|
|
- Examples:
|
|
- `release/v1.0.0`
|
|
- `release/v1.1.0`
|
|
- `release/v2.0.0`
|
|
|
|
### Naming Guidelines
|
|
- Use lowercase letters
|
|
- Use hyphens to separate words
|
|
- Be descriptive but concise
|
|
- Avoid special characters (except hyphens)
|
|
- Keep names under 50 characters
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Commit Message Conventions
|
|
|
|
We follow the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/) specification. This format enables automated changelog generation and better commit history readability.
|
|
|
|
### Format
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
<type>(<scope>): <subject>
|
|
|
|
<body>
|
|
|
|
<footer>
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Commit Types
|
|
|
|
| Type | Description | Examples |
|
|
|------|-------------|----------|
|
|
| `feat` | New feature | `feat(fonts): add Google Fonts integration` |
|
|
| `fix` | Bug fix | `fix(comparison): resolve font loading race condition` |
|
|
| `docs` | Documentation changes | `docs(readme): update installation instructions` |
|
|
| `style` | Code style changes (formatting, etc.) | `style(components): format with Prettier` |
|
|
| `refactor` | Code refactoring | `refactor(stores): simplify state management` |
|
|
| `test` | Adding or updating tests | `test(fonts): add unit tests for font mapper` |
|
|
| `chore` | Maintenance tasks | `chore(deps): update Tailwind CSS to v4.0` |
|
|
| `perf` | Performance improvements | `perf(catalog): implement lazy loading for fonts` |
|
|
|
|
### Scope
|
|
|
|
The scope provides context about which part of the codebase is affected. Common scopes for this project:
|
|
|
|
- `fonts` - Font-related functionality
|
|
- `comparison` - Font comparison features
|
|
- `catalog` - Font catalog pages
|
|
- `stores` - State management stores
|
|
- `components` - UI components
|
|
- `routes` - SvelteKit routes
|
|
- `services` - External API services
|
|
- `utils` - Utility functions
|
|
- `types` - TypeScript type definitions
|
|
- `ui` - UI-related changes (theme, layout, etc.)
|
|
- `config` - Configuration files
|
|
|
|
### Subject
|
|
|
|
- Use imperative mood ("add" not "added", "fix" not "fixed")
|
|
- Keep it short (50 characters or less)
|
|
- Don't end with a period
|
|
- Be specific and descriptive
|
|
|
|
### Body
|
|
|
|
- Use imperative mood
|
|
- Explain **what** and **why**, not **how**
|
|
- Wrap at 72 characters
|
|
- Include references to issues (e.g., `Closes #123`)
|
|
|
|
### Footer
|
|
|
|
- Reference breaking changes with `BREAKING CHANGE:`
|
|
- Reference issues with `Closes #123` or `Fixes #456`
|
|
- Include co-authors if needed
|
|
|
|
### Examples
|
|
|
|
#### Feature Commit
|
|
```
|
|
feat(fonts): add Google Fonts API integration
|
|
|
|
Implement Google Fonts API service to fetch and display available fonts.
|
|
This includes the fetchGoogleFonts function and font mapper utilities.
|
|
|
|
Closes #12
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
#### Bug Fix Commit
|
|
```
|
|
fix(comparison): resolve font loading race condition
|
|
|
|
The comparison grid was attempting to render fonts before they were fully
|
|
loaded. Added loading state checks to prevent this issue.
|
|
|
|
Fixes #45
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
#### Refactor Commit
|
|
```
|
|
refactor(stores): simplify state management with Svelte 5 runes
|
|
|
|
Migrated from Svelte stores to Svelte 5's $state runes for better
|
|
performance and simpler code. This change affects all stores in the
|
|
project.
|
|
|
|
BREAKING CHANGE: Store API has changed from subscribe() to direct
|
|
property access. Update all store consumers accordingly.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
#### Documentation Commit
|
|
```
|
|
docs(git-workflow): add commit message conventions
|
|
|
|
Document the conventional commits format with examples and guidelines
|
|
for the team.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
#### Chore Commit
|
|
```
|
|
chore(deps): update Tailwind CSS to v4.0.0
|
|
|
|
Update Tailwind CSS to the latest version and adjust configuration
|
|
files accordingly.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Code Splitting and Merge Request Guidelines
|
|
|
|
### Merge Request Size Guidelines
|
|
|
|
- **Maximum MR size**: < 500 lines changed (additions + deletions)
|
|
- **Ideal MR size**: 100-300 lines changed
|
|
- **Files per MR**: < 10 files
|
|
|
|
### When to Split a Feature into Multiple MRs
|
|
|
|
Split a feature into multiple MRs when:
|
|
|
|
1. **The feature is large** (> 500 lines or > 10 files)
|
|
2. **Multiple concerns are involved** (e.g., UI + API + state management)
|
|
3. **Independent parts can be tested separately**
|
|
4. **The feature has logical phases** (e.g., setup → implementation → polish)
|
|
|
|
### Example: Splitting a Feature
|
|
|
|
**Feature**: Font Catalog with Filtering
|
|
|
|
**MR 1**: `feature/font-catalog-setup`
|
|
- Create basic catalog page structure
|
|
- Set up routing
|
|
- Add placeholder components
|
|
- ~150 lines
|
|
|
|
**MR 2**: `feature/font-catalog-data`
|
|
- Implement Google Fonts API integration
|
|
- Create font data fetching logic
|
|
- Add font mapper utilities
|
|
- ~200 lines
|
|
|
|
**MR 3**: `feature/font-catalog-ui`
|
|
- Build FontCard component
|
|
- Implement grid layout
|
|
- Add loading states
|
|
- ~250 lines
|
|
|
|
**MR 4**: `feature/font-catalog-filtering`
|
|
- Implement filter store
|
|
- Build FilterBar component
|
|
- Connect filters to catalog
|
|
- ~180 lines
|
|
|
|
### Merge Request Description Template
|
|
|
|
Every MR must include a comprehensive description:
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
## Description
|
|
Brief description of what this MR changes and why.
|
|
|
|
## Changes Made
|
|
- [ ] Change 1
|
|
- [ ] Change 2
|
|
- [ ] Change 3
|
|
|
|
## Type of Change
|
|
- [ ] Bug fix
|
|
- [ ] New feature
|
|
- [ ] Breaking change
|
|
- [ ] Documentation update
|
|
- [ ] Refactoring
|
|
- [ ] Performance improvement
|
|
|
|
## Testing
|
|
- [ ] Unit tests pass
|
|
- [ ] Manual testing completed
|
|
- [ ] Tested on Chrome
|
|
- [ ] Tested on Firefox
|
|
- [ ] Tested on Safari
|
|
- [ ] Tested on mobile (responsive)
|
|
|
|
## Screenshots (if applicable)
|
|
Add screenshots or GIFs showing the changes.
|
|
|
|
## Checklist
|
|
- [ ] Code follows project style guidelines
|
|
- [ ] Self-review completed
|
|
- [ ] Comments added for complex logic
|
|
- [ ] Documentation updated
|
|
- [ ] No new warnings generated
|
|
- [ ] Tests added/updated
|
|
- [ ] All tests passing
|
|
|
|
## Related Issues
|
|
Closes #123
|
|
Related to #456
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Code Review Checklist
|
|
|
|
Reviewers should check:
|
|
|
|
#### Functionality
|
|
- [ ] Does the code work as intended?
|
|
- [ ] Are edge cases handled?
|
|
- [ ] Is error handling appropriate?
|
|
|
|
#### Code Quality
|
|
- [ ] Is the code readable and maintainable?
|
|
- [ ] Are variable/function names descriptive?
|
|
- [ ] Is there unnecessary complexity?
|
|
- [ ] Are there code duplications?
|
|
|
|
#### Best Practices
|
|
- [ ] Does it follow project conventions?
|
|
- [ ] Are TypeScript types properly defined?
|
|
- [ ] Are Svelte best practices followed?
|
|
- [ ] Is Tailwind CSS used appropriately?
|
|
|
|
#### Testing
|
|
- [ ] Are tests included?
|
|
- [ ] Do tests cover edge cases?
|
|
- [ ] Are tests meaningful and not redundant?
|
|
|
|
#### Documentation
|
|
- [ ] Is the code self-documenting?
|
|
- [ ] Are complex functions commented?
|
|
- [ ] Is the MR description clear?
|
|
|
|
#### Performance
|
|
- [ ] Are there performance concerns?
|
|
- [ ] Is lazy loading used where appropriate?
|
|
- [ ] Are unnecessary re-renders avoided?
|
|
|
|
### Merge Request Approval Process
|
|
|
|
1. **Author**: Creates MR with complete description
|
|
2. **Reviewer**: Reviews code using the checklist above
|
|
3. **Discussion**: Address any concerns or suggestions
|
|
4. **Approval**: At least one approval required
|
|
4. **Merge**: Squash and merge into target branch
|
|
5. **Cleanup**: Delete source branch after merge
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Branch Protection Rules
|
|
|
|
### `main` Branch Protection
|
|
|
|
- **Require pull request reviews**: Yes
|
|
- Required approvers: 1
|
|
- Dismiss stale reviews: Yes
|
|
- **Require status checks**: Yes
|
|
- Required checks: All tests, linting
|
|
- Require branches to be up to date: Yes
|
|
- **Restrict who can push**: Only maintainers
|
|
- **Require linear history**: Yes (squash and merge)
|
|
- **Block force pushes**: Yes
|
|
|
|
### `develop` Branch Protection
|
|
|
|
- **Require pull request reviews**: Yes
|
|
- Required approvers: 1
|
|
- Dismiss stale reviews: Yes
|
|
- **Require status checks**: Yes
|
|
- Required checks: All tests, linting
|
|
- Require branches to be up to date: Yes
|
|
- **Restrict who can push**: Only developers and maintainers
|
|
- **Require linear history**: Yes (squash and merge)
|
|
- **Block force pushes**: Yes
|
|
|
|
### Implementation Notes
|
|
|
|
These rules should be configured in your Git hosting platform (GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket). The exact configuration steps vary by platform:
|
|
|
|
- **GitHub**: Settings → Branches → Add rule
|
|
- **GitLab**: Settings → Repository → Protected branches
|
|
- **Bitbucket**: Repository settings → Branch restrictions
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Git Hooks Configuration
|
|
|
|
Git hooks are automated scripts that run at specific points in the git workflow. They help maintain code quality and consistency.
|
|
|
|
### Recommended Hooks
|
|
|
|
#### 1. Pre-commit Hook
|
|
**Purpose**: Run linter and formatter before committing
|
|
|
|
**Tools**: ESLint, Prettier
|
|
|
|
**Implementation**:
|
|
```bash
|
|
#!/bin/sh
|
|
# .git/hooks/pre-commit
|
|
|
|
# Run Prettier
|
|
npm run format:check
|
|
|
|
# Run ESLint
|
|
npm run lint
|
|
|
|
# Exit with error if any check fails
|
|
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
|
|
echo "❌ Pre-commit checks failed. Please fix the issues before committing."
|
|
exit 1
|
|
fi
|
|
|
|
echo "✅ Pre-commit checks passed."
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Setup**:
|
|
```bash
|
|
# Install husky (recommended)
|
|
npm install --save-dev husky
|
|
|
|
# Initialize husky
|
|
npx husky install
|
|
|
|
# Add pre-commit hook
|
|
npx husky add .husky/pre-commit "npm run lint && npm run format:check"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
#### 2. Commit-msg Hook
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate commit message format
|
|
|
|
**Tools**: commitlint
|
|
|
|
**Implementation**:
|
|
```bash
|
|
#!/bin/sh
|
|
# .git/hooks/commit-msg
|
|
|
|
# Validate commit message with commitlint
|
|
npx --no -- commitlint --edit $1
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Setup**:
|
|
```bash
|
|
# Install commitlint
|
|
npm install --save-dev @commitlint/cli @commitlint/config-conventional
|
|
|
|
# Create commitlint config
|
|
echo "module.exports = { extends: ['@commitlint/config-conventional'] };" > commitlint.config.js
|
|
|
|
# Add commit-msg hook
|
|
npx husky add .husky/commit-msg "npx --no -- commitlint --edit \$1"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
#### 3. Pre-push Hook
|
|
**Purpose**: Run tests before pushing
|
|
|
|
**Tools**: Vitest, SvelteKit test runner
|
|
|
|
**Implementation**:
|
|
```bash
|
|
#!/bin/sh
|
|
# .git/hooks/pre-push
|
|
|
|
# Run tests
|
|
npm run test
|
|
|
|
# Exit with error if tests fail
|
|
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
|
|
echo "❌ Tests failed. Please fix the failing tests before pushing."
|
|
exit 1
|
|
fi
|
|
|
|
echo "✅ All tests passed."
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Setup**:
|
|
```bash
|
|
# Add pre-push hook
|
|
npx husky add .husky/pre-push "npm run test"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Alternative: Using Husky
|
|
|
|
[Husky](https://typicode.github.io/husky/) is a popular tool for managing git hooks. It's easier to maintain and works across different operating systems.
|
|
|
|
**Installation**:
|
|
```bash
|
|
npm install --save-dev husky
|
|
npx husky install
|
|
npm pkg set scripts.prepare="husky install"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Adding hooks**:
|
|
```bash
|
|
# Pre-commit hook
|
|
npx husky add .husky/pre-commit "npm run lint && npm run format:check"
|
|
|
|
# Commit-msg hook
|
|
npx husky add .husky/commit-msg "npx --no -- commitlint --edit \$1"
|
|
|
|
# Pre-push hook
|
|
npx husky add .husky/pre-push "npm run test"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Hook Scripts for This Project
|
|
|
|
Once the project is set up with SvelteKit, add these scripts to `package.json`:
|
|
|
|
```json
|
|
{
|
|
"scripts": {
|
|
"format": "prettier --write .",
|
|
"format:check": "prettier --check .",
|
|
"lint": "eslint .",
|
|
"lint:fix": "eslint . --fix",
|
|
"test": "vitest run",
|
|
"test:watch": "vitest",
|
|
"prepare": "husky install"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Benefits of Git Hooks
|
|
|
|
1. **Consistency**: Enforce code style and formatting
|
|
2. **Quality**: Catch bugs before they're committed
|
|
3. **Efficiency**: Fail fast, fix early
|
|
4. **Automation**: Reduce manual checks
|
|
5. **Team alignment**: Ensure everyone follows the same standards
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Summary
|
|
|
|
This git workflow provides a structured approach to development for the glyphdiff.com project:
|
|
|
|
- **Clear branching strategy** with defined purposes for each branch type
|
|
- **Conventional commits** for readable and automated changelogs
|
|
- **Code splitting guidelines** to keep MRs focused and reviewable
|
|
- **Comprehensive review process** to maintain code quality
|
|
- **Git hooks** to automate quality checks
|
|
|
|
Following this workflow will help the team:
|
|
- Develop features in parallel without conflicts
|
|
- Maintain a clean git history
|
|
- Catch issues early in the development process
|
|
- Ensure code quality and consistency
|
|
- Streamline the release process
|
|
|
|
For questions or suggestions about this workflow, please discuss with the team or create an issue in the project repository.
|